It is not “just” quantitative growth. It is a change in competitive positioning<\/strong>. The Italian consumer no longer chooses MDD to fall back on minimum price: he chooses it because he trusts it. Nine out of ten Italians<\/strong> say they trust private label products, and the segments that drive the sector are no longer first prices (growing marginally) but mainstream, organic, and premium.<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n For FMCG category managers<\/strong>, pricing managers<\/strong>, and trade marketing managers<\/strong>, this means only one thing: the pricing, assortment, and promotional visibility models built over the past decade need to be revised. MDD is no longer the “discount competitor” to be looked down upon. It is a brand guarantor<\/strong> playing on the same field as industrial brands, with progressively more sophisticated differentiation levers. <\/p>\n\n Just considering the classical GD perimeter formed by Iper, Super and Superette, MDD’s share growth stands at 23 percent, for a turnover worth 16.6 Bn.<\/p>\n\n In this article, we go into the details of the phenomenon with a dual vantage point: the scenario data presented at Brand 2026 and-most importantly-QBerg<\/strong> proprietary evidence on price differentials and Private Label’s share of promotional visibility<\/strong> by product category.<\/p>\n\n The TEHA-Ambrosetti<\/em> report for ADM, presented on January 14, 2026 in Bologna, captures a phenomenon that is growing structurally, not cyclically. We summarize the key indicators for those operating in FMCG: <\/p>\n\n There is one detail that deserves strategic reading. In 2025 , MDD prices grew +1.4%, more than the branded industry<\/strong>. Translated: private label is reducing dependence on discount leverage and building value through premiumization<\/strong>. Functional products (organic, free-from, enriched) grow +19% in value<\/strong>. “First price” lines are up only +3%, and are no longer the growth engine. <\/p>\n\n TEHA’s Benedetta Brioschi puts it bluntly: MDD is now a value choice<\/em>, no longer a convenience choice. For industrial brands, this is a sign that competition is being played out on a different level than on the shelf a decade ago. <\/p>\n\n The Ambrosetti data tells the what<\/em>. The real then?<\/em> – what every category manager must bring to the CDA-emerges by cross-referencing the scenario data with timely monitoring of promotional and price positioning by category<\/strong>. This is exactly the territory in which QBerg operates. <\/p>\n\n Through the In-Store POINT Flyer<\/strong> and In-Store POINT Web<\/strong> suites, we constantly monitor how MDD is positioned on the flyer<\/strong> and online<\/strong> relative to industrial brands. Evidence from our database shows that the value market share told by Circana is only the tip of the iceberg<\/strong>: at the level of promotional visibility-measured<\/strong> through our proprietary QP3<\/strong> indicator-Private Label has already conquered territories where the value share will reach in the next 24-36 months. <\/p>\n\n Let’s look at cross proprietary data by channel:<\/p>\n\n What the aggregate figure does not say is that MDD is advancing in historically difficult channels (pharmacy, tech) and is structuring itself at different speeds. For an industry brand, understanding where<\/strong> PL is growing and where<\/strong> it is consolidating is the difference between a timely countermove and a passively suffered erosion. <\/p>\n\n There is a second element that the summary data does not tell: the price differential<\/strong> between branded industry and private label is gradually narrowing, but unevenly by category<\/strong>. Premium MDD is moving closer to the leading brands; first-price MDD is trying to keep its distance from the discounters. <\/p>\n\n For a Pricing Manager, this means that the price range<\/strong> is no longer a static metric to be surveyed once a quarter. It is a dynamic<\/strong> metric that varies by: <\/p>\n\n QBerg monitoring, through the In-Store POINT platform transforms data into competitive advantage<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n The picture that emerges from the intersection of Brand 2026 data and QBerg monitoring has concrete implications for those running a category P&L:<\/p>\n\n For leading industrial brands<\/strong>: the aggregate promotional pressure of Top10 manufacturers is declining in the main channels monitored. It means that the freed promotional space is rapidly occupied by MDD and aggressive followers<\/em>. The risk is a progressive loss of share of voice<\/strong> on the flyer, which precedes the loss of value share by 12-18 months. <\/p>\n\n For retailers<\/strong>: MDD is no longer an “easy” margin lever. Consumers expect quality, consistency with the sign’s values, and a distinct brand identity. The signs that are growing the most are those that have structured PL as a true brand, with identifiable premium, organic, and functional lines. <\/p>\n\n For Pricing Managers<\/strong>: the Brand vs MDD differential should be monitored continuously<\/strong>, not after the campaign is over. MDD pricing grows more than industry pricing, and this opens, for premium brands, repricing windows to be seized with timing. For mainstream brands, it is time to review price architecture and promotional intensity before the spread closes for good. <\/p>\n\n For Trade Marketing Managers<\/strong>: visibility share on flyer (QP3) and online should be negotiated by category, not by total sign. QBerg data show huge differences between macrocategories: where PL is leading (e.g., Pharmacy Personal Care at 12.48%, Pet Specialist at 35%) negotiating prime position<\/em> becomes crucial to not disappear from consumer radar. <\/p>\n\n Turning these insights into profitable decisions requires structured, up-to-date, cross-channel data. QBerg and Circana’s In-Store POINT suite provides: <\/p>\n\n In a market where the Distributor Brand<\/strong> has ceased to be an alternative and has become a pillar of trust<\/strong>, navigating by sight is no longer an option. Continuous, granular and actionable data are needed. <\/p>\n\n Want to measure the price differential and visibility share of MDD in your categories?<\/strong> ![\"Chart](\"https:\/\/www.qberg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1-mdd-quota-sellout-iss-1024x457.png\")
Brand 2026’s numbers: an industry running twice as fast as the market<\/h3>\n\n
\n
The QBerg observation point: beyond the summary data<\/h3>\n\n
![\"Comparison](\"https:\/\/www.qberg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2-mdd-quota-flyer-vari-mercati-1024x554.png\")
\n
Brand vs. MDD price differential: the real playing field<\/h3>\n\n
\n
What it means, operationally, for industry and retail<\/h3>\n\n
From data to action with the In-Store POINT suite<\/h3>\n\n
\n
\n\n